By
Rick Morris
You
didn’t think that David Stern, master of choreographed reality, was going to go
out as commissioner with an Indiana-San Antonio Finals, did you?
While
on the surface the no-drama, small-market Spurs surely aren’t Stern’s idea of a
“chosen team” like the Heat clearly are, it’s worth noting that the
Duncan-LeBron Finals rematch of ’07 is the first time two stars with a
legitimate chance to be rated in the Top Ten of all time have faced off for a
second time on this stage since the Magic-Bird pairings of the 1980s – surely a
fitting coda to Stern’s star-obsessed tenure atop the league. What have been the next-best repeat pairings
since those mid-‘80s clashes? The list
probably consists of Kobe/Garnett (2008, 2010), Wade/Dirk (2006, 2011), Jordan/Stockton
& Malone (1997-98) and Magic/Isiah (1988-89). And Duncan-LeBron clearly marks the greatest
clash of resumes since Michael-Magic in ’91 – keeping in mind that MJ hadn’t
won a championship yet and that last year’s Durant-LeBron matchup will loom
larger in the years to come assuming that OKC’s megastar stays healthy.
For
Duncan, who is on the back nine of one of the greatest careers in league
history, the chance to dispatch LeBron a second time (in what would be a
relatively big upset this time, a role reversal of ’07), may well cinch his
place on the all-time hierarchy over his counterpart who has shined over him in
terms of media accolades, Kobe Bryant.
Think about it: Garnett was probably the best player he ever faced in
the Finals and he was only 1-1 against him (and Kobe lost two Finals while Duncan
would remain unblemished). For the egomaniacal
Mamba, who was chasing Greatest of All-Time (GOAT) billing not too long ago, to
be decisively eclipsed as the best player of his own generation would be a
bitter pill to swallow.
As
such, he’d probably take the tradeoff of rooting for LeBron and taking his
chances on the leader of the “Heatles” running him down for GOAT billing one
day. Fortunately for Kobe, that outcome
seems fairly likely.
Going
inside the numbers:
^
The two teams are astoundingly evenly matched in PPG, with Miami at 102.9 and
San Antonio at 103. Miami’s defense is a
bit better, as they have allowed 95 points per game, while the Spurs clock in
at 96.6.
^ Everyone
and their grandmother was pointing out how Indiana was a horrible matchup for
Miami in terms of pounding them inside and indeed, the Pacers were the top team
in the league this year at 45.9 RPG and the Heat was dead last at 38.6. The Spurs rate at 41.3, so they are much less
able to exploit Miami’s greatest vulnerability.
Strangely, the entire difference between the Finals teams comes from
defensive rebounding, as the Heat are actually slightly better on the offensive
end at 8.2-8.1.
^
San Antonio’s the league leader in assists per game at 25.1, but Miami is not
too far behind at 23.
^
Free-throw shooting represents the other category with some degree of
difference. The Spurs are third in the
league at 79.1%, while Miami is a mediocre 75.4%.
Of
those factors, it’s hard to shake the notion that rebounding matters the
most. The Pacers showed what was
possible against Miami with a vastly superior interior presence, but didn’t
have enough consistent big-time firepower at this stage of their evolution to
put the Heat away (only 94.7 PPG in the regular season). Indiana only had four scorers above 9.5 PPG,
while the supremely-balanced Spurs have seven.
At the same time, this is the first time during the San Antonio run of
Finals appearances without a megastar, as Duncan has receded to “regular star”
status since 2007 and probably even slots behind Tony Parker at that
level. San Antonio would be trying to
replicate what only the 1989 Pistons, 1990 Pistons and 2004 Pistons have done
in the “modern history” of the league – win the championship without such a
megastar. And fittingly, Detroit learned
once again just how hard that was in 2005 – when they were deposed by an
in-his-prime Duncan and the Spurs. As a
lifelong Cavs fan, I don’t anticipate the outcome I want, and I certainly hope
that I’m bringing the “reverse jinx,” but the signs are all pointing in one
inescapable direction. Miami in six (11-3 record through the first
three rounds).
No comments:
Post a Comment