By Rick Morris
Even without
Matt Kemp and Allen Craig, the 2013 NLCS between the Dodgers and Cardinals
features an array of many of the best players in baseball.
Start with
Clayton Kershaw, the LA ace who is commonly regarded as the game’s best
starting pitcher at this point in time.
Then move to the team’s #2, Zack Greinke, who is pitching up to his Cy
Young form for the only time since he snagged the AL honor in 2009. With Yasiel Puig providing one of the most
explosive rookie impacts on a squad in MLB history, a renewed Hanley Ramirez
snatching back his designation as one of the game’s very best and Adrian
Gonzalez slugging at first base the way the Red Sox once envisioned (possible
irony alert for the World Series), just like in the entertainment industry, LA
has the star power covered.
The Cards also
boast one of the game’s finest arms in Adam Wainwright and have two of this era’s
best sluggers in Matt Holliday and (a revived) Carlos Beltran. So while the Dodgers have ripped the claim of
“the best team money can buy” from the Yankees, the Cards are no slouch in this
regard.
And so this
battle between the scratch-‘em-out-in-October Cards (one of the two best teams
in recent years at achieving above the talent level on paper in the postseason,
with the other being the Giants) and alleged champions-in-waiting Dodgers is
more evenly matched on paper than the surface indications would allow. Here’s how the checkmarks appear in key
areas:
^ Lineup
explosiveness at the core: Dodgers
^ Lineup
effectiveness, top to bottom: Cardinals
^ Bench:
Cardinals
^ Starting
rotation, spots #1-2: Dodgers
^ Starting
rotation, spots #1-4: Cardinals
^ Bullpen:
Dodgers
In both the
starting rotation and the lineup, the Dodgers have the star-power
explosiveness, but the Cardinals have the top-to-bottom edge.
Taking the
Dodgers feels like a sucker’s bet, something that feels obvious based on
payroll, hype and the vaunted second-half surge. Compared to the Cardinals’ propensity in
recent years for pushing through and winning series in which they appear at
least slightly on paper to be underdogs, the trendline appears clear. But trendlines don’t account for the likes of
Kershaw, a transcendent talent with a chance at his first world championship. As we witnessed many times over the years,
but perhaps most notably in 2001 (Randy Johnson, Curt Schilling) and 2004
(Schilling, Pedro Martinez), a killer 1-2 combo at the top of the rotation can
be the most important factor. Kershaw
and Greinke are both at an elite level at this moment in time and that will be
enough in the end. Dodgers in five (4-2 record through the first two rounds, 4-0 in
the LDS).
No comments:
Post a Comment